From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13792 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2002 05:10:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13778 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2002 05:10:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta06bw.bigpond.com) (139.134.6.96) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2002 05:10:00 -0000 Received: from bubble.local ([144.135.24.69]) by mta06bw.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta06bw Apr 29 2002 13:22:02) with SMTP id GYCMCL00.FAA for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:09:57 +1000 Received: from CPE-144-136-176-14.sa.bigpond.net.au ([144.136.176.14]) by bwmam01.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0n 8/23400560); 27 Jun 2002 15:09:57 Received: (qmail 23583 invoked by uid 179); 27 Jun 2002 05:09:56 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 22:10:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Elias Athanasopoulos Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: powerpc64 and "nm -C" Message-ID: <20020627050956.GC22093@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> Mail-Followup-To: Elias Athanasopoulos , binutils@sources.redhat.com References: <20020626132058.GW22093@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020626202253.D1131@neutrino.particles.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020626202253.D1131@neutrino.particles.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00737.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:22:53PM +0300, Elias Athanasopoulos wrote: > Just a thought: wouldn't be better to embed this functionality in > the demangler, since it [the demangler] is not used only by nm? Yes, you're right. Perhaps we should use a bfd_demangle function. Thanks for pointing this out. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre