From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30523 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2002 16:15:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30492 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2002 16:15:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO palrel13.hp.com) (156.153.255.238) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2002 16:15:47 -0000 Received: from hpda.cup.hp.com (cup.hp.com [15.75.208.53]) by palrel13.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C46400189; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpsje.cup.hp.com (hpsje.cup.hp.com [15.244.96.221]) by hpda.cup.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CC177DC; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sje@localhost) by hpsje.cup.hp.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_17190)/8.7.3 TIS Messaging 5.0) id JAA16249; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 09:51:00 -0000 From: Steve Ellcey Message-Id: <200207151615.JAA16249@hpsje.cup.hp.com> To: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca, aoliva@redhat.com, rittle@labs.mot.com Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Add hppa*64* support to libtool in binutils X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 > This is a first cut at adding hppa64 support to libtool in binutils. > The same needs to done in gcc and in the libtool source. Unfortunately, > the binutils and gcc sources are somewhat out of sync, so it seems > separate patches will be needed in each case. David, I verified that if my GCC libtool patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-07/msg00527.html) is applied to GCC then your binutils patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-07/msg00397.html) can be applied to GCC with out any changes. I put both patches to my local tree (binutils and GCC) over the weekend and tested on PA32, PA64, and IA64 HP-UX and had no problems. This would leave Loren Rittle's GCC libtool patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00234.html) as the only difference between the binutils and GCC libtools. Loren, do you know of any reason this patch couldn't be applied to the binutils libtool? I applied it to my binutils tree with no apparent bad effects. It probably isn't needed in binutils but it would keep the two versions of libtool in synch. Steve Ellcey sje@cup.hp.com