From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2831 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2002 13:34:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2816 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2002 13:34:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lodoss.net) (213.22.66.43) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2002 13:34:36 -0000 Received: from lodoss.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lodoss.net (8.12.5/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g6MDWqtD019099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:32:53 -0300 (ART) Received: (from fgsch@localhost) by lodoss.net (8.12.5/8.12.1/Submit) id g6MDWpi3030666; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:32:52 -0300 (ART) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 07:05:00 -0000 From: "Federico G. Schwindt" To: Nick Clifton Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: FW: gprof license Message-ID: <20020722133251.GU20237@deedlit> References: <20020716131937.GB25263@deedlit> <20020717195612.GA25263@deedlit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00549.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:28:07AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Federico. > > > I think this doesn't do it. What needs to be done it's to update > > the BSD license to a later one, that includes modification. > > OK, so a patch like this, applied to all the relevant files, would be > OK then ? Yes, this is exactly what's needed. Thanks, f.-