From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23237 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2002 13:39:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23230 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2002 13:39:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc53.attbi.com) (204.127.198.39) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Oct 2002 13:39:16 -0000 Received: from lucon.org ([12.234.88.146]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20021014133915.JWNL17158.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@lucon.org> for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:39:15 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B893D2C4EC; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 06:39:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: bfd version Message-ID: <20021014063915.B26924@lucon.org> References: <20021014213414.E22176@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021014213414.E22176@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>; from amodra@bigpond.net.au on Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 09:34:14PM +0930 X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 09:34:14PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > bfd version and date strings are currently created by some black magic > in bfd/configure and find their way into the build bfd/bfd.h. This > scheme unfortunately doesn't update the version unless you re- > configure (or perhaps fortunately, as touching bfd.h causes many files > to be recompiled). So I've moved the version macros to version.h, > and added some machinery to create a build copy. > Thanks. I was wondering why I couldn't duplicate the ld failure unless I did a configure. H.J.