From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-21574-listarch-binutils=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25768 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 06:00:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25761 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 06:00:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc01.attbi.com) (204.127.202.61)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 06:00:23 -0000
Received: from lucon.org ([12.234.88.146]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20021016060022.JSNT28253.sccrmhc01.attbi.com@lucon.org>;
          Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:00:22 +0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 638D42C4EC; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:00:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Stephen Clarke <stephen.clarke@earthling.net>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output
Message-ID: <20021015230020.A29100@lucon.org>
References: <002e01c2749c$e15e2980$6301a8c0@wren> <20021015202723.B26432@lucon.org> <002701c274ce$0434cf50$6301a8c0@wren> <20021015223217.A28658@lucon.org> <000a01c274d8$7c7e5fd0$6301a8c0@wren>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <000a01c274d8$7c7e5fd0$6301a8c0@wren>; from stephen.clarke@earthling.net on Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:51:59PM -0700
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00389.txt.bz2

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:51:59PM -0700, Stephen Clarke wrote:
> From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:32 PM
> 
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 09:39:29PM -0700, Stephen Clarke wrote:
> > > From: "H. J. Lu"
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:27 PM
> > > > 
> > > > That is not right. Something is wrong with ELF/SH. Can you tell me
> > > > the difference between elf32-sh64big-linux and elf32-sh64 in the
> > > > ELF header?
> > > 
> > > I can't: I don't think there is a difference in the ELF header.
> > > The same issue applies to non-sh64 targets,
> > > e.g.elf32-shl and elf32-sh-linux.
> > > 
> > 
> > Then, I have to ask, what are the differences between elf32-shl and
> > elf32-sh-linux? If you tell me that, I may come up with something.
> 
> If you mean what are the differences in the ELF header between
> elf32-shl and elf32-sh-linux, then I don't think there are any.   If I

No, why do you have elf32-shl and elf32-sh-linux? Can you just use
elf32-shl for Linux?


H.J.