From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-21591-listarch-binutils=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 26158 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2002 15:14:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 26147 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 15:14:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc02.attbi.com) (204.127.202.62)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 15:14:44 -0000
Received: from lucon.org ([12.234.88.146]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20021016151443.TXGR12986.sccrmhc02.attbi.com@lucon.org>;
          Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:14:43 +0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id ED7272C4EC; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:14:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Stephen Clarke <stephen.clarke@earthling.net>,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output
Message-ID: <20021016081442.A4326@lucon.org>
References: <002e01c2749c$e15e2980$6301a8c0@wren> <20021015202723.B26432@lucon.org> <002701c274ce$0434cf50$6301a8c0@wren> <20021015223217.A28658@lucon.org> <000a01c274d8$7c7e5fd0$6301a8c0@wren> <20021015230020.A29100@lucon.org> <20021015233936.A29638@lucon.org> <20021016181722.U22176@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20021016061625.A2765@lucon.org> <20021017003304.Z22176@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20021017003304.Z22176@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>; from amodra@bigpond.net.au on Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:33:04AM +0930
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00406.txt.bz2

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:33:04AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 06:16:25AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > If NetBSD uses the same
> > ABI as Linux, they should share the same ELFOSABI_XXX.
> 
> Aye, but should NetBSD use ELFOSABI_LINUX or Linux use ELFOSABI_NETBSD?
> Bun fight coming up..
> 

I took a look. I believe the straight ELF/sh should use

#define ELFOSABI_STANDALONE 255 /* Standalone (embedded) application */

and we delete Linux/sh and NetBSD/sh. Then we create Unix/sh with

#define ELFOSABI_NONE   0       /* UNIX System V ABI */

I hope it is not late to do the right thing. That means there is no
change in Linux/sh/NetBSD/sh binaries. But ELF/sh will be different.


H.J.