From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-25296-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9080 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2003 22:53:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9067 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2003 22:53:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2003 22:53:08 -0000
Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail)
	by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 192fUH-0006HQ-00
	for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 17:53:13 -0500
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 192fUA-0001hh-00
	for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 18:53:06 -0400
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 22:53:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: incorrect use of bfd_arch_bits_per_address in elf32-mips.c
Message-ID: <20030407225305.GA21490@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
References: <or4r5ajbrz.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <or4r5ajbrz.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2

On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 05:25:04PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> +      if ((elf_elfheader (abfd)->e_flags & (E_MIPS_ABI_O64
> +					    | E_MIPS_ABI_EABI64)) != 0)

Wait... it's 64-bit in O64 and EABI64 but not in N64?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer