From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21042 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2003 17:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21035 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2003 17:39:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 17:39:55 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 198OE0-0006tm-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:40:04 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 198ODj-0007ew-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:39:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:39:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Clifton Cc: Joern Rennecke , binutils@sources.redhat.com, Alexandre Oliva , Alan Modra Subject: Re: RFA: Fix readelf -wi test (Was: Re: readelf: apply all rela relocations in the debug_info section) Message-ID: <20030423173947.GA29365@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Clifton , Joern Rennecke , binutils@sources.redhat.com, Alexandre Oliva , Alan Modra References: <3EA58964.E0269B6F@superh.com> <3EA58B57.F6F58A01@superh.com> <3EA5A211.14A57085@superh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00455.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 06:34:31PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Joern, > > > The reaadelf.wi template hasn't been updated in years, and not only > > the representation of the debug information, even the source file > > numbers are out of date; that mean that any sucess on this testcase > > (not counting XFAILs) on any target must have been a bug. > > I've updated readelf.wi so that the test passes for sh-elf; the readelf.out > > for sh-elf is attached separately. The output style change that I have > > considered a bug is the adding of a trailing "; " in every location > > expression, e.g. (DW_OP_addr: 0) . > > The following patch implements this readelf.wi update and suppression of > > the trailing "; ". > > Your patch still does not resolve the "readelf: Warning: Skipping > unexpected symbol type 1" problem that you mentioned in your earlier > post. In my opinion however the readelf.wi is severely broken, since > there is no real guaranteed structure to the output of "readelf -wi". > > Instead I am going to apply your patch together with a change of my > own. This additional patch: > > * Filters out "skipping unexpected symbol" messages. But are they "expected"? Or are they a bug? I think they're probably a bug... -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer