From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2261 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2003 15:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2245 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2003 15:36:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc02.attbi.com) (204.127.202.62) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2003 15:36:00 -0000 Received: from lucon.org (12-234-88-5.client.attbi.com[12.234.88.5]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with ESMTP id <2003042515360000200o0oaie>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:36:00 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1DF5A2C681; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:36:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Nick Clifton , joern.rennecke@superh.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Fix readelf -wi test (Was: Re: readelf: apply all rela relocations in the debug_info section) Message-ID: <20030425083600.A28269@lucon.org> References: <3EA58964.E0269B6F@superh.com> <3EA58B57.F6F58A01@superh.com> <3EA5A211.14A57085@superh.com> <3EA81C8D.376CC322@superh.com> <20030425133812.GA15817@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030425133812.GA15817@nevyn.them.org>; from drow@mvista.com on Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 09:38:12AM -0400 X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00521.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 09:38:12AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 10:31:53AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi Joern, Hi H.J. > > > > > > Anyway it looks like we need to reduce the text inside readelf.wi even > > > > more. I suspect that the best thing to do would be to delete the test > > > > entirely. Do you agree ? > > > > > > It is useful to find regressions like the stray "; ", or readelf giving > > > extra warning messages. > > > Till we find someone who volunteers to sort the output intelligently, > > > we could at least grep for the most salient bits, i.e.: > > > grep DW_AT_producer < readelf.out > readelf.out2 > > > grep DW_AT_language < readelf.out >> readelf.out2 > > > grep 'DW_AT_name.*: fn' < readelf.out >> readelf.out2 > > > etc. > > > > That would be good. > > > > HJ - Do you still get failures from this test with your x86 Linux > > build ? If not, then lets leave the test as it is until someone gets > > around to rewriting it properly. Otherwise I will have a go at > > reworking it to Joern's suggestion. > > I can reproduce them here on gcc 3.2.3pre. Same symptom; things come > out in a different order. > I still have the same problem on RedHat 9 with gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5). H.J.