From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12508 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2003 20:09:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12500 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2003 20:09:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crack.them.org) (65.125.64.184) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2003 20:09:18 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org ([66.93.61.169] ident=mail) by crack.them.org with asmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 199sSu-0001Zg-00 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:09:36 -0500 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 199sSa-0004iG-00 for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:09:16 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: What happened to using the "cpu" directory? Message-ID: <20030427200916.GA18082@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00562.txt.bz2 Whatever source files were going to be moved to src/cpu/ never were. I'm going to revert the change to include it in binutils tarballs on the branch, but probably whatever was going to be moved ought to be on the trunk. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer