* replace mips-*n*bsd in
@ 2003-04-28 20:53 cgd
2003-04-28 23:16 ` Alan Modra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: cgd @ 2003-04-28 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: amodra
Rev 1.114 of gas/configure.in changed:
! mips-*-elf* | mips-*-rtems* | mips-*-netbsd* | mips-*-openbsd*)
! fmt=elf ;;
to be:
! mips-*-elf* | mips-*-rtems*) fmt=elf ;;
! mips-*-*n*bsd*) fmt=elf ;;
The latter is just too obtuse. Somebody who wants to find the netbsd
configure fragment will have a harder time than they should. (I did!
8-)
I'd like to see the patch below on the trunk and the branch. This
puts the OS names back, for these targets.
Alan, you made the original change:
2002-08-09 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
* configure.in: bfd_gas=yes for all i386 targets. Formatting.
Remove "bfd_gas=yes" from target table when covered later.
Consolidate some entries.
* configure: Regenerate
While i'm all for consolidating, is there any reason to take it that
far?!
chris
--
[ gas/ChangeLog ]
2003-04-28 Chris Demetriou <cgd@broadcom.com>
* configure.in (mips-*-*n*bsd*): Replace with...
(mips-*-netbsd*, mips-*-openbsd*): These.
* configure: Regenerate.
Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.128
diff -u -p -r1.128 configure.in
--- configure.in 1 Apr 2003 15:50:29 -0000 1.128
+++ configure.in 28 Apr 2003 20:50:43 -0000
@@ -373,7 +373,8 @@ changequote([,])dnl
mips-*-sysv4*MP* | mips-*-gnu*) fmt=elf em=tmips ;;
mips-*-sysv*) fmt=ecoff ;;
mips-*-elf* | mips-*-rtems*) fmt=elf ;;
- mips-*-*n*bsd*) fmt=elf ;;
+ mips-*-netbsd*) fmt=elf ;;
+ mips-*-openbsd*) fmt=elf ;;
mips-*-vxworks*) fmt=elf ;;
mmix-*-*) fmt=elf ;;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: replace mips-*n*bsd in
2003-04-28 20:53 replace mips-*n*bsd in cgd
@ 2003-04-28 23:16 ` Alan Modra
[not found] ` <mailpost.1051571783.9996@news-sj1-1>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Modra @ 2003-04-28 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cgd; +Cc: binutils
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 01:53:05PM -0700, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> I'd like to see the patch below on the trunk and the branch. This
> puts the OS names back, for these targets.
That's fine.
> While i'm all for consolidating, is there any reason to take it that
> far?!
To fit them all on one line? I can't remember why I did it.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: replace mips-*n*bsd in
[not found] ` <mailpost.1051571783.9996@news-sj1-1>
@ 2003-04-28 23:51 ` cgd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: cgd @ 2003-04-28 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: amodra; +Cc: binutils
At Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:16:23 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Modra" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 01:53:05PM -0700, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> > I'd like to see the patch below on the trunk and the branch. This
> > puts the OS names back, for these targets.
>
> That's fine.
OK, I've taken that as approval-enough. 8-)
> > While i'm all for consolidating, is there any reason to take it that
> > far?!
>
> To fit them all on one line? I can't remember why I did it.
Heh. I know that feeling!
thanks,
chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-28 23:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-28 20:53 replace mips-*n*bsd in cgd
2003-04-28 23:16 ` Alan Modra
[not found] ` <mailpost.1051571783.9996@news-sj1-1>
2003-04-28 23:51 ` cgd
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).