From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-26041-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16515 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 14:16:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16506 invoked from network); 8 May 2003 14:16:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc03.attbi.com) (204.127.202.63)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 May 2003 14:16:05 -0000
Received: from lucon.org (12-234-88-5.client.attbi.com[12.234.88.5])
          by attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with ESMTP
          id <2003050814160500300bcjn3e>; Thu, 8 May 2003 14:16:05 +0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id EAF472C681; Thu,  8 May 2003 07:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 14:16:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: Fix ia64 visibility
Message-ID: <20030508071604.C13118@lucon.org>
References: <20030506160402.B11085@lucon.org> <20030507180932.GC8118@redhat.com> <20030507111946.A28152@lucon.org> <20030507223034.GL27351@redhat.com> <20030507161508.A32635@lucon.org> <20030507231715.GQ27351@redhat.com> <20030507225153.A5968@lucon.org> <20030508080143.GA8330@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20030508080143.GA8330@redhat.com>; from rth@redhat.com on Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:01:43AM -0700
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2

On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:01:43AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:51:53PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > I didn't create a new function since it isn't used anywhere else.
> 
> Yet.

We will add a new function when it is needed.

> 
> > 	* elfxx-ia64.c (_bfd_elf_link_hash_hide_symbol): Also clear the
> > 	want_plt field.
> > 	(elfNN_ia64_relocate_section): Don't do dynamic symbol lookup
> > 	for symbols with non-default visibility.
> 
> I guess this is ok.
> 

Done. BTW, there are no regressions with "make check" on glibc and
gcc from CVS.


H.J.