From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-26511-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27297 invoked by alias); 24 May 2003 04:22:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27264 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 04:22:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bromo.msbb.uc.edu) (129.137.3.146)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 May 2003 04:22:43 -0000
Received: (from howarth@localhost)
	by bromo.msbb.uc.edu (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA31660;
	Sat, 24 May 2003 00:22:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 04:22:00 -0000
From: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Message-Id: <200305240422.AAA31660@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, dan@debian.org
Subject: libopcodes.so mislinked
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00735.txt.bz2

    From building HJ's 2.14.90.0.3 binutils release tonight
it appears we may have a problem in binutils cvs. I found that
with binutils 2.14.90.0.2 installed when I built 2.14.90.0.3,
which was released today, I got a mislinking of the installed
libbfd-2.14.90.0.2.so into the new libopcodes-2.14.90.0.3.so 
instead of the new libbfd-2.14.90.0.3.so. Can someone check
a fix in for this?
                            Jack