From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-28000-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17510 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2003 17:26:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17493 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2003 17:26:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ns2.uk.superh.com) (193.128.105.170)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2003 17:26:19 -0000
Received: from sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com (sh-uk-ex01 [192.168.16.17])
	by ns2.uk.superh.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6NHKkK07580;
	Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:20:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: from linsvr1.uk.superh.com ([192.168.16.50]) by sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
	 Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:26:42 +0100
Received: (from renneckej@localhost)
	by linsvr1.uk.superh.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h6NHQ0a08463;
	Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:26:00 +0100
From: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
Message-Id: <200307231726.h6NHQ0a08463@linsvr1.uk.superh.com>
Subject: Re: Why so many failures for Linux/sh64?
To: hjl@lucon.org (H. J. Lu)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:26:00 -0000
Cc: joern.rennecke@superh.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
   thorpej@wasabisystems.com (Jason Thorpe)
In-Reply-To: <20030723141906.GA15708@lucon.org> from "H. J. Lu" at Jul 23, 2003 07:19:06 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jul 2003 17:26:42.0318 (UTC) FILETIME=[951FBAE0:01C3513F]
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00458.txt.bz2

> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:44:10PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > I got many
> > > 
> > > /export/build/linux/binutils/build-sh64-linux/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump:
> > > Matching formats: elf32-sh64big-linux elf32-sh64
> > > FAIL: SH PIC constructs
> > > 
> 
> Why do we need so many elf32/sh64 targets? What are differences
> between NetBSD/sh64 and Linux/sh64? Can't we set ELF_MAXPAGESIZE
> and elf_symbol_leading_char based on target and share one elf32/sh64
> target? They can have a default and we can change them from outside.

I don't know of any particular reason.  Jason, do you?