From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20807 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2003 14:38:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20800 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2003 14:38:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) (216.148.227.85) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2003 14:38:11 -0000 Received: from lucon.org ([12.234.88.5]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2003072514380901400ckgpoe>; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:38:10 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 137382C4EB; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:38:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Nick Clifton Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Don't use section name to set ELF section data Message-ID: <20030725143806.GA29992@lucon.org> References: <20030614190932.GA5459@lucon.org> <20030725013603.GB17609@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00508.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:25:31PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi H.J. > > > Here is the new patch. It caused no regressions on all targets > > affected. It fixed an ELF/ppc64 bug. > > Excellent. ... > Approved - please apply. > Done. I made a small change. I used if (! BFD_SEND ((B), _new_section_hook, ((B), (S)))) \ instead of if (!_bfd_elf_new_section_hook ((B), (S))) \ H.J.