From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-28358-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25842 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2003 18:57:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25835 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2003 18:57:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (66.187.237.200)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Aug 2003 18:57:35 -0000
Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7BIvY2m024372;
	Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:57:34 -0700
Received: (from rth@localhost)
	by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h7BIvY2O024370;
	Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:57:34 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:57:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, mostrows@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: powerpc64-linux hack
Message-ID: <20030811185734.GB24357@redhat.com>
References: <20030811112952.GZ27145@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030811112952.GZ27145@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2

On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 08:59:52PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> +			   && strcmp (h->root.root.string,
> +				      ".__libc_start_main") == 0)

You really should use a special branch relocation instead.
This could be used elsewhere as well, no doubt.


r~