From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18764 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2003 13:38:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18754 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2003 13:38:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2003 13:38:47 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h7GDckt12787 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:38:46 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h7GDcks22276; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:38:46 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h7GDckd15546; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:38:46 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h7GDcj618581; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:38:45 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 13:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200308161338.h7GDcj618581@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: ian@airs.com CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Ian Lance Taylor on 15 Aug 2003 22:19:21 -0700) Subject: Re: [patch] new sh relocs References: <200308152051.h7FKp5b14273@greed.delorie.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00285.txt.bz2 > But, but, isn't moving relocs going to break existing object files? Sad but true. At least it's only objects built with relax on. Renesas noted such incompatibility in their request to us. Note that there are a lot of other relocs that may need to be moved later, too. The ones I'm moving now are the ones that conflict with relocs their compiler currently uses.