From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28504 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2003 18:37:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28238 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2003 18:37:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Aug 2003 18:37:37 -0000 Received: from envy.delorie.com (envy.delorie.com [207.22.48.171]) by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id h7PIbUU25001 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:37:30 -0400 Received: from envy.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by envy.delorie.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7PIbULX020275 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:37:30 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by envy.delorie.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h7PIbS4K020271; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:37:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:37:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200308251837.h7PIbS4K020271@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Alexandre Oliva on 16 Aug 2003 12:21:15 -0300) Subject: Re: [patch] new sh relocs X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00384.txt.bz2 Ok, so what do I do with this patch? It seems that the only objection is that it's not backwards compatible, but since we're doing this to link against SHC-built objects we can't do anything about that anyway.