From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30568 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2003 00:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30550 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2003 00:07:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Sep 2003 00:07:11 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h86079l24573 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:07:10 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h86079s01521; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:07:09 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h86078d13161; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:07:08 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h86077V14026; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:07:07 -0400 Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 00:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200309060007.h86077V14026@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: aoliva@redhat.com CC: amodra@bigpond.net.au, ian@airs.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Alexandre Oliva on 16 Aug 2003 12:21:15 -0300) Subject: Re: [patch] new sh relocs References: <200308152051.h7FKp5b14273@greed.delorie.com> <200308161338.h7GDcj618581@greed.delorie.com> <20030816135520.GL27145@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 > Unfortunately we're the ones that got the ABI wrong, and Renesas tools > don't emit any EI_* markers we could use to tell, so we should just > take the risk and change the meaning of relocs we've been generating > with the wrong meaning. So where are we on this patch? Can I commit it, or what?