From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12414 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2003 19:40:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12378 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2003 19:40:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO igw2.watson.ibm.com) (129.34.20.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2003 19:40:51 -0000 Received: from sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com [9.2.112.57]) by igw2.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7-20030924/8.11.4) with ESMTP id hATJeHC109562; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:40:17 -0500 Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sp1n293en1.watson.ibm.com (8.11.7-20030924/8.11.7) with ESMTP id hATJeCI69658; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:40:12 -0500 Received: from makai.watson.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makai.watson.ibm.com (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0/03-06-2002) with ESMTP id hATJeBT34016; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:40:11 -0500 Message-Id: <200311291940.hATJeBT34016@makai.watson.ibm.com> To: Andrew Pinski , binutils@sources.redhat.com, Gcc ML , Kris Warkentin Subject: Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? In-Reply-To: Message from Alan Modra of "Sat, 29 Nov 2003 17:17:15 +1030." <20031129064715.GX2508@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> References: <087e01c3b5da$77d658e0$0202040a@catdog> <20031129014255.GT2508@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <200311290232.hAT2WPT28318@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20031129030541.GV2508@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <200311290406.hAT46IT28816@makai.watson.ibm.com> <200311290420.hAT4K8T30938@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20031129064715.GX2508@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:40:00 -0000 From: David Edelsohn X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2 >>>>> Alan Modra writes: Alan> Geoff analyzed the problem enough to see that TARGET_RELOCATABLE Alan> implies flag_pic == 2, so there's no need for any special hacks. Alan> See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-10/msg01575.html Okay, go ahead and apply you patch to rs6000_elf_section_type_flags(). We may still want to move RELOCATABLE_NEEDS_FIXUP from sysv4.h to eabi.h. David