* Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
[not found] <20040409210142.GA31470@nevyn.them.org>
@ 2004-04-22 16:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-22 17:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-04-22 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: Richard Earnshaw, Nick Clifton
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> This has been kicking around in my tree for a while now. It adds support
> for the .cfi_* directives, using the standard or FPA registers - I didn't
> bother adding any of the other coprocessor registers, since their numbering
> is still a little unclear, and usually the general purpose registers are all
> you need.
>
> Tested on arm-elf. OK?
Ping?
> 2004-04-09 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
>
> * Makefile.am: Run dep-am.
> * aclocal.m4: Regenerate with automake 1.8.3.
> * Makefile.in: Regenerate with automake 1.8.3.
> * doc/Makefile.in: Likewise.
>
> * config/tc-arm.c: Include "dw2gencfi.h".
> (tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum, tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions):
> New functions.
> * config/tc-arm.h (TARGET_USE_CFIPOP, DWARF2_DEFAULT_RETURN_COLUMN)
> (DWARF2_CIE_DATA_ALIGNMENT, tc_regname_to_dw2regnum)
> (tc_cfi_frame_initial_instructions): Define.
> (tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum, tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions):
> Add prototypes.
>
> 2004-04-09 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
>
> * gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d, gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s: New files.
> * gas/cfi/cfi.exp: Run cfi-arm-1 test.
>
> Index: gas/Makefile.am
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/gas/Makefile.am,v
> retrieving revision 1.86
> diff -u -p -r1.86 Makefile.am
> --- gas/Makefile.am 19 Mar 2004 07:05:54 -0000 1.86
> +++ gas/Makefile.am 9 Apr 2004 20:54:09 -0000
> @@ -1027,7 +1027,8 @@ DEPTC_arm_elf = $(INCDIR)/symcat.h $(src
> $(BFDDIR)/elf-bfd.h $(INCDIR)/elf/common.h $(INCDIR)/elf/internal.h \
> $(INCDIR)/elf/external.h $(INCDIR)/bfdlink.h $(srcdir)/config/tc-arm.h \
> $(INCDIR)/safe-ctype.h subsegs.h $(INCDIR)/obstack.h \
> - $(INCDIR)/elf/arm.h $(INCDIR)/elf/reloc-macros.h dwarf2dbg.h
> + $(INCDIR)/elf/arm.h $(INCDIR)/elf/reloc-macros.h dwarf2dbg.h \
> + dw2gencfi.h $(INCDIR)/elf/dwarf2.h
> DEPTC_avr_coff = $(INCDIR)/symcat.h $(srcdir)/config/obj-coff.h \
> $(srcdir)/config/tc-avr.h $(INCDIR)/coff/internal.h \
> $(BFDDIR)/libcoff.h $(INCDIR)/bfdlink.h $(INCDIR)/safe-ctype.h \
> Index: gas/config/tc-arm.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/gas/config/tc-arm.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.165
> diff -u -p -r1.165 tc-arm.c
> --- gas/config/tc-arm.c 30 Mar 2004 08:53:05 -0000 1.165
> +++ gas/config/tc-arm.c 9 Apr 2004 20:25:53 -0000
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #ifdef OBJ_ELF
> #include "elf/arm.h"
> #include "dwarf2dbg.h"
> +#include "dw2gencfi.h"
> #endif
>
> /* XXX Set this to 1 after the next binutils release */
> @@ -14365,3 +14366,27 @@ arm_init_frag (fragP)
> /* Record whether this frag is in an ARM or a THUMB area. */
> fragP->tc_frag_data = thumb_mode;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef OBJ_ELF
> +int
> +tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum (const char *regname)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; rn_table[i].name; i++)
> + if (strcmp (regname, rn_table[i].name) == 0)
> + return rn_table[i].number;
> +
> + for (i = 0; fn_table[i].name; i++)
> + if (strcmp (regname, fn_table[i].name) == 0)
> + return fn_table[i].number + 16;
> +
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions (void)
> +{
> + cfi_add_CFA_def_cfa (REG_SP, 0);
> +}
> +#endif
> Index: gas/config/tc-arm.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/gas/config/tc-arm.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.21
> diff -u -p -r1.21 tc-arm.h
> --- gas/config/tc-arm.h 21 Nov 2003 00:24:40 -0000 1.21
> +++ gas/config/tc-arm.h 9 Apr 2004 20:25:53 -0000
> @@ -223,3 +223,17 @@ extern void arm_handle_align PARAMS ((st
> goto LABEL; \
> }
> extern void arm_frag_align_code PARAMS ((int, int));
> +
> +/* We want .cfi_* pseudo-ops for generating unwind info. */
> +#define TARGET_USE_CFIPOP 1
> +
> +/* The lr register is r14. */
> +#define DWARF2_DEFAULT_RETURN_COLUMN 14
> +
> +#define DWARF2_CIE_DATA_ALIGNMENT -4
> +
> +#define tc_regname_to_dw2regnum tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum
> +extern int tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum PARAMS ((const char *regname));
> +
> +#define tc_cfi_frame_initial_instructions tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions
> +extern void tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions PARAMS ((void));
> Index: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d
> diff -N gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d
> --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> +++ gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d 9 Apr 2004 20:44:18 -0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +#readelf: -wf
> +#name: CFI on ARM
> +
> +The section .eh_frame contains:
> +
> +00000000 00000010 00000000 CIE
> + Version: 1
> + Augmentation: "zR"
> + Code alignment factor: 2
> + Data alignment factor: -4
> + Return address column: 14
> + Augmentation data: 1b
> +
> + DW_CFA_def_cfa: r13 ofs 0
> +
> +00000014 00000020 00000018 FDE cie=00000000 pc=0000001c..00000034
> + DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to 00000020
> + DW_CFA_def_cfa: r12 ofs 0
> + DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to 00000024
> + DW_CFA_def_cfa: r13 ofs 16
> + DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to 00000028
> + DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 32
> + DW_CFA_offset: r11 at cfa-32
> + DW_CFA_offset: r14 at cfa-24
> + DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to 0000002c
> + DW_CFA_def_cfa: r11 ofs 16
> +
> Index: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s
> diff -N gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s
> --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> +++ gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s 9 Apr 2004 20:48:55 -0000
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +#; $ as -o test.o gas-cfi-test.s && gcc -nostdlib -o test test.o
> +
> + .file "a.c"
> + .text
> + .align 2
> + .global foo
> + .type foo, %function
> +foo:
> + .cfi_startproc
> + mov ip, sp
> + .cfi_def_cfa ip, 0
> + stmfd sp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3}
> + .cfi_def_cfa sp, 16
> + stmfd sp!, {fp, ip, lr, pc}
> + .cfi_adjust_cfa_offset 16
> + .cfi_rel_offset r11, 0
> + .cfi_rel_offset lr, 8
> + sub fp, ip, #20
> + .cfi_def_cfa fp, 16
> + nop
> + ldmea fp, {fp, sp, pc}
> + .cfi_endproc
> + .size foo, .-foo
> Index: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp,v
> retrieving revision 1.11
> diff -u -p -r1.11 cfi.exp
> --- gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp 18 Mar 2004 00:49:23 -0000 1.11
> +++ gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp 9 Apr 2004 20:38:33 -0000
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ if [istarget "x86_64-*"] then {
> run_dump_test "cfi-sh-1"
> }
>
> +} elseif { [istarget "arm*-*"] || [istarget "xscale*-*"] } then {
> + run_dump_test "cfi-arm-1"
> +
> } else {
> return
> }
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
2004-04-22 16:32 ` [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2004-04-22 17:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-04-22 17:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2004-04-22 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: binutils, Nick Clifton
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 17:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > This has been kicking around in my tree for a while now. It adds support
> > for the .cfi_* directives, using the standard or FPA registers - I didn't
> > bother adding any of the other coprocessor registers, since their numbering
> > is still a little unclear, and usually the general purpose registers are all
> > you need.
> >
> > Tested on arm-elf. OK?
>
> Ping?
Sorry, missed this one (if you will post messages on a UK public
holiday...)
I think that we should be looking to move to the EABI DWARF register
numbers soon (http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/abi/aadwarf.pdf). I
would rather that we didn't introduce new uses of the old register
numbering schemes.
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
2004-04-22 17:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
@ 2004-04-22 17:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-03 17:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-23 18:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-04-22 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Earnshaw; +Cc: binutils, Nick Clifton
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 17:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > This has been kicking around in my tree for a while now. It adds support
> > > for the .cfi_* directives, using the standard or FPA registers - I didn't
> > > bother adding any of the other coprocessor registers, since their numbering
> > > is still a little unclear, and usually the general purpose registers are all
> > > you need.
> > >
> > > Tested on arm-elf. OK?
> >
> > Ping?
>
> Sorry, missed this one (if you will post messages on a UK public
> holiday...)
>
> I think that we should be looking to move to the EABI DWARF register
> numbers soon (http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/abi/aadwarf.pdf). I
> would rather that we didn't introduce new uses of the old register
> numbering schemes.
In that case, would the patch be OK without the FPA registers? I only
have actual need for the core integer registers.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
2004-04-22 17:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2004-05-03 17:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-19 15:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-23 18:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-05-03 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Earnshaw, binutils, Nick Clifton
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:05:00PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 17:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > This has been kicking around in my tree for a while now. It adds support
> > > > for the .cfi_* directives, using the standard or FPA registers - I didn't
> > > > bother adding any of the other coprocessor registers, since their numbering
> > > > is still a little unclear, and usually the general purpose registers are all
> > > > you need.
> > > >
> > > > Tested on arm-elf. OK?
> > >
> > > Ping?
> >
> > Sorry, missed this one (if you will post messages on a UK public
> > holiday...)
> >
> > I think that we should be looking to move to the EABI DWARF register
> > numbers soon (http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/abi/aadwarf.pdf). I
> > would rather that we didn't introduce new uses of the old register
> > numbering schemes.
>
> In that case, would the patch be OK without the FPA registers? I only
> have actual need for the core integer registers.
Ping?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
2004-05-03 17:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2004-09-19 15:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-09-19 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Earnshaw, binutils
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:20:36PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:05:00PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 17:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > > This has been kicking around in my tree for a while now. It adds support
> > > > > for the .cfi_* directives, using the standard or FPA registers - I didn't
> > > > > bother adding any of the other coprocessor registers, since their numbering
> > > > > is still a little unclear, and usually the general purpose registers are all
> > > > > you need.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested on arm-elf. OK?
> > > >
> > > > Ping?
> > >
> > > Sorry, missed this one (if you will post messages on a UK public
> > > holiday...)
> > >
> > > I think that we should be looking to move to the EABI DWARF register
> > > numbers soon (http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/abi/aadwarf.pdf). I
> > > would rather that we didn't introduce new uses of the old register
> > > numbering schemes.
> >
> > In that case, would the patch be OK without the FPA registers? I only
> > have actual need for the core integer registers.
>
> Ping?
Hi Richard,
When you get a chance, could you respond to this patch?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
2004-04-22 17:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-03 17:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2004-10-23 18:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-25 12:28 ` Nick Clifton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2004-10-23 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Earnshaw, binutils, Nick Clifton
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:05:00PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 17:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > This has been kicking around in my tree for a while now. It adds support
> > > > for the .cfi_* directives, using the standard or FPA registers - I didn't
> > > > bother adding any of the other coprocessor registers, since their numbering
> > > > is still a little unclear, and usually the general purpose registers are all
> > > > you need.
> > > >
> > > > Tested on arm-elf. OK?
> > >
> > > Ping?
> >
> > Sorry, missed this one (if you will post messages on a UK public
> > holiday...)
> >
> > I think that we should be looking to move to the EABI DWARF register
> > numbers soon (http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/abi/aadwarf.pdf). I
> > would rather that we didn't introduce new uses of the old register
> > numbering schemes.
>
> In that case, would the patch be OK without the FPA registers? I only
> have actual need for the core integer registers.
Ping again?
Nick asked that I repost the original patch. Here it is, updated for
HEAD. I've left out the FPA numbering for now. I don't see the EABI
DWARF numbers coming in to use "soon", but they agree on the numbers of
the general purpose registers, so this should be OK.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-23 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
* Makefile.am: Run dep-am.
* aclocal.m4: Regenerate with automake 1.9.2.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate with automake 1.9.2.
* doc/Makefile.in: Likewise.
* config/tc-arm.c: Include "dw2gencfi.h".
(tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum, tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions):
New functions.
* config/tc-arm.h (TARGET_USE_CFIPOP, DWARF2_DEFAULT_RETURN_COLUMN)
(DWARF2_CIE_DATA_ALIGNMENT, tc_regname_to_dw2regnum)
(tc_cfi_frame_initial_instructions): Define.
(tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum, tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions):
Add prototypes.
2004-10-23 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
* gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d, gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s: New files.
* gas/cfi/cfi.exp: Run cfi-arm-1 test.
Index: gas/Makefile.am
===================================================================
RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/gas/Makefile.am,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -p -r1.96 Makefile.am
--- gas/Makefile.am 15 Oct 2004 05:49:33 -0000 1.96
+++ gas/Makefile.am 23 Oct 2004 18:22:28 -0000
@@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ DEPTC_arm_elf = $(INCDIR)/symcat.h $(src
$(INCDIR)/elf/external.h $(INCDIR)/bfdlink.h $(srcdir)/config/tc-arm.h \
$(INCDIR)/safe-ctype.h subsegs.h $(INCDIR)/obstack.h \
$(INCDIR)/opcode/arm.h $(INCDIR)/elf/arm.h $(INCDIR)/elf/reloc-macros.h \
- dwarf2dbg.h
+ dwarf2dbg.h dw2gencfi.h $(INCDIR)/elf/dwarf2.h
DEPTC_avr_coff = $(INCDIR)/symcat.h $(srcdir)/config/obj-coff.h \
$(srcdir)/config/tc-avr.h $(INCDIR)/coff/internal.h \
$(BFDDIR)/libcoff.h $(INCDIR)/bfdlink.h $(INCDIR)/safe-ctype.h \
Index: gas/config/tc-arm.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/gas/config/tc-arm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.183
diff -u -p -r1.183 tc-arm.c
--- gas/config/tc-arm.c 12 Oct 2004 14:17:06 -0000 1.183
+++ gas/config/tc-arm.c 23 Oct 2004 17:58:50 -0000
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
#ifdef OBJ_ELF
#include "elf/arm.h"
#include "dwarf2dbg.h"
+#include "dw2gencfi.h"
#endif
/* XXX Set this to 1 after the next binutils release. */
@@ -14859,6 +14860,31 @@ arm_init_frag (fragS * fragP)
fragP->tc_frag_data = thumb_mode;
}
+#ifdef OBJ_ELF
+
+/* Convert REGNAME to a DWARF-2 register number. */
+
+int
+tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum (const char *regname)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; rn_table[i].name; i++)
+ if (strcmp (regname, rn_table[i].name) == 0)
+ return rn_table[i].number;
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+/* Initialize the DWARF-2 unwind information for this procedure. */
+
+void
+tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions (void)
+{
+ cfi_add_CFA_def_cfa (REG_SP, 0);
+}
+#endif
+
/* This table describes all the machine specific pseudo-ops the assembler
has to support. The fields are:
pseudo-op name without dot
Index: gas/config/tc-arm.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/gas/config/tc-arm.h,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -p -r1.23 tc-arm.h
--- gas/config/tc-arm.h 1 Oct 2004 12:59:41 -0000 1.23
+++ gas/config/tc-arm.h 23 Oct 2004 18:05:48 -0000
@@ -180,6 +180,19 @@ enum mstate
MAP_THUMB
};
+/* We want .cfi_* pseudo-ops for generating unwind info. */
+#define TARGET_USE_CFIPOP 1
+
+/* The lr register is r14. */
+#define DWARF2_DEFAULT_RETURN_COLUMN 14
+
+/* Registers are generally saved at negative offsets to the CFA. */
+#define DWARF2_CIE_DATA_ALIGNMENT -4
+
+/* CFI hooks. */
+#define tc_regname_to_dw2regnum tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum
+#define tc_cfi_frame_initial_instructions tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions
+
#else /* Not OBJ_ELF. */
#define GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_NAME "__GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_"
#endif
@@ -211,4 +224,5 @@ extern void arm_init_frag (struct frag *
extern void arm_handle_align (struct frag *);
extern bfd_boolean arm_fix_adjustable (struct fix *);
extern int arm_elf_section_type (const char *, size_t);
-
+extern int tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum (const char *regname);
+extern void tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions (void);
Index: gas/doc/Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/gas/doc/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -p -r1.58 Makefile.in
--- gas/doc/Makefile.in 17 Sep 2004 06:17:47 -0000 1.58
+++ gas/doc/Makefile.in 23 Oct 2004 18:24:41 -0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Makefile.in generated by automake 1.9.1 from Makefile.am.
+# Makefile.in generated by automake 1.9.2 from Makefile.am.
# @configure_input@
# Copyright (C) 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002,
Index: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d
===================================================================
RCS file: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d
diff -N gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d 23 Oct 2004 18:18:23 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+#readelf: -wf
+#name: CFI on ARM
+
+The section .eh_frame contains:
+
+00000000 00000010 00000000 CIE
+ Version: 1
+ Augmentation: "zR"
+ Code alignment factor: 2
+ Data alignment factor: -4
+ Return address column: 14
+ Augmentation data: 1b
+
+ DW_CFA_def_cfa: r13 ofs 0
+
+00000014 00000020 00000018 FDE cie=00000000 pc=00000000..00000018
+ DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to 00000004
+ DW_CFA_def_cfa: r12 ofs 0
+ DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to 00000008
+ DW_CFA_def_cfa: r13 ofs 16
+ DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to 0000000c
+ DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 32
+ DW_CFA_offset: r11 at cfa-32
+ DW_CFA_offset: r14 at cfa-24
+ DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to 00000010
+ DW_CFA_def_cfa: r11 ofs 16
+
Index: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s
===================================================================
RCS file: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s
diff -N gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s 23 Oct 2004 18:06:50 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+#; $ as -o test.o gas-cfi-test.s && gcc -nostdlib -o test test.o
+
+ .file "a.c"
+ .text
+ .align 2
+ .global foo
+ .type foo, %function
+foo:
+ .cfi_startproc
+ mov ip, sp
+ .cfi_def_cfa ip, 0
+ stmfd sp!, {r0, r1, r2, r3}
+ .cfi_def_cfa sp, 16
+ stmfd sp!, {fp, ip, lr, pc}
+ .cfi_adjust_cfa_offset 16
+ .cfi_rel_offset r11, 0
+ .cfi_rel_offset lr, 8
+ sub fp, ip, #20
+ .cfi_def_cfa fp, 16
+ nop
+ ldmea fp, {fp, sp, pc}
+ .cfi_endproc
+ .size foo, .-foo
Index: gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /big/fsf/rsync/src-cvs/src/gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 cfi.exp
--- gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp 7 Oct 2004 15:18:11 -0000 1.12
+++ gas/testsuite/gas/cfi/cfi.exp 23 Oct 2004 18:06:50 -0000
@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ if [istarget "x86_64-*"] then {
run_dump_test "cfi-sh-1"
}
+} elseif { [istarget "arm*-*"] || [istarget "xscale*-*"] } then {
+ run_dump_test "cfi-arm-1"
+
} else {
return
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
2004-10-23 18:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2004-10-25 12:28 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2004-10-25 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: Richard Earnshaw, binutils
Hi Daniel,
> 2004-10-23 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
>
> * Makefile.am: Run dep-am.
> * aclocal.m4: Regenerate with automake 1.9.2.
> * Makefile.in: Regenerate with automake 1.9.2.
> * doc/Makefile.in: Likewise.
>
> * config/tc-arm.c: Include "dw2gencfi.h".
> (tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum, tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions):
> New functions.
> * config/tc-arm.h (TARGET_USE_CFIPOP, DWARF2_DEFAULT_RETURN_COLUMN)
> (DWARF2_CIE_DATA_ALIGNMENT, tc_regname_to_dw2regnum)
> (tc_cfi_frame_initial_instructions): Define.
> (tc_arm_regname_to_dw2regnum, tc_arm_frame_initial_instructions):
> Add prototypes.
>
> 2004-10-23 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
>
> * gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.d, gas/cfi/cfi-arm-1.s: New files.
> * gas/cfi/cfi.exp: Run cfi-arm-1 test.
>
Approved and applied.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-25 12:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20040409210142.GA31470@nevyn.them.org>
2004-04-22 16:32 ` [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-22 17:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-04-22 17:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-03 17:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-19 15:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-23 18:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-25 12:28 ` Nick Clifton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).