public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFA] bfd_cache_close_all
@ 2004-06-16 16:17 Jerome Guitton
  2004-06-17  2:22 ` Alan Modra
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Guitton @ 2004-06-16 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils; +Cc: gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 320 bytes --]

Hello,

In GDB, it would be useful on several platforms (e.g. win32) to
force BFD to release the file handles. Details are here:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-05/msg00678.html

The idea would be to have a function bfd_cache_close_all that would
clear the file descriptor cache.

OK to apply?

--
Jerome

[-- Attachment #2: bfd_cache_close_all.dif --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2342 bytes --]

2004-06-16  Jerome Guitton  <guitton@gnat.com>

	* bfd-in.h (bfd_cache_close_all): New function declaration.
        * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate.
        * cache.c (bfd_cache_close_all): New function definition.

Index: bfd-in.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/bfd-in.h,v
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -r1.81 bfd-in.h
--- bfd-in.h	15 Jun 2004 01:24:22 -0000	1.81
+++ bfd-in.h	16 Jun 2004 13:12:59 -0000
@@ -511,6 +511,8 @@
   (bfd *abfd);
 /* NB: This declaration should match the autogenerated one in libbfd.h.  */
 
+extern bfd_boolean bfd_cache_close_all (void);
+
 extern bfd_boolean bfd_record_phdr
   (bfd *, unsigned long, bfd_boolean, flagword, bfd_boolean, bfd_vma,
    bfd_boolean, bfd_boolean, unsigned int, struct bfd_section **);
Index: bfd-in2.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/bfd-in2.h,v
retrieving revision 1.280
diff -u -r1.280 bfd-in2.h
--- bfd-in2.h	15 Jun 2004 01:24:22 -0000	1.280
+++ bfd-in2.h	16 Jun 2004 13:12:59 -0000
@@ -518,6 +518,8 @@
   (bfd *abfd);
 /* NB: This declaration should match the autogenerated one in libbfd.h.  */
 
+extern bfd_boolean bfd_cache_close_all (void);
+
 extern bfd_boolean bfd_record_phdr
   (bfd *, unsigned long, bfd_boolean, flagword, bfd_boolean, bfd_vma,
    bfd_boolean, bfd_boolean, unsigned int, struct bfd_section **);
Index: cache.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/cache.c,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.14 cache.c
--- cache.c	5 May 2004 15:39:11 -0000	1.14
+++ cache.c	16 Jun 2004 13:12:59 -0000
@@ -344,6 +344,42 @@
 }
 
 /*
+FUNCTION
+	bfd_cache_close_all
+
+SYNOPSIS
+	bfd_boolean bfd_cache_close_all (void);
+
+DESCRIPTION
+	Remove all BFDs from the cache. If the attached file is open,
+	then close it too.
+
+RETURNS
+	<<FALSE>> is returned if closing one of the file fails, <<TRUE>> is
+	returned if all is well.
+*/
+
+bfd_boolean
+bfd_cache_close_all ()
+{
+  bfd_boolean ret = TRUE;
+  register bfd *kill;
+
+  if (!bfd_last_cache)
+    return TRUE;
+  
+  for (kill = bfd_last_cache->lru_prev;
+       open_files;
+       kill = kill->lru_prev)
+    {
+      ret = ret && bfd_cache_close (kill);
+    }
+
+  return ret;
+}
+
+
+/*
 INTERNAL_FUNCTION
 	bfd_open_file
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] bfd_cache_close_all
  2004-06-16 16:17 [RFA] bfd_cache_close_all Jerome Guitton
@ 2004-06-17  2:22 ` Alan Modra
  2004-06-17 11:51   ` Jerome Guitton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan Modra @ 2004-06-17  2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jerome Guitton; +Cc: binutils, gdb-patches

On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:17:48PM +0200, Jerome Guitton wrote:
> The idea would be to have a function bfd_cache_close_all that would
> clear the file descriptor cache.
> 
> OK to apply?

> +  if (!bfd_last_cache)
> +    return TRUE;
> +  
> +  for (kill = bfd_last_cache->lru_prev;
> +       open_files;
> +       kill = kill->lru_prev)
> +    {
> +      ret = ret && bfd_cache_close (kill);
> +    }

No need to close oldest first.  OK with the following change to simplify
the code.

  while (bfd_last_cache != NULL)
    ret &= bfd_cache_close (bfd_last_cache);

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] bfd_cache_close_all
  2004-06-17  2:22 ` Alan Modra
@ 2004-06-17 11:51   ` Jerome Guitton
  2004-06-17 11:58     ` Jerome Guitton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Guitton @ 2004-06-17 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils, gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 247 bytes --]

Alan Modra (amodra@bigpond.net.au):

> No need to close oldest first.  OK with the following change to simplify
> the code.
> 
>   while (bfd_last_cache != NULL)
>     ret &= bfd_cache_close (bfd_last_cache);

Thanks. Patch committed.

-- 
Jerome

[-- Attachment #2: bfd_cache_close_all.dif --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2170 bytes --]

2004-06-17  Jerome Guitton  <guitton@gnat.com>

	* bfd-in.h (bfd_cache_close_all): New function declaration.
	* bfd-in2.h: Regenerate.
	* cache.c (bfd_cache_close_all): New function definition.

Index: bfd-in.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/bfd-in.h,v
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -r1.81 bfd-in.h
--- bfd-in.h	15 Jun 2004 01:24:22 -0000	1.81
+++ bfd-in.h	17 Jun 2004 10:34:24 -0000
@@ -511,6 +511,8 @@
   (bfd *abfd);
 /* NB: This declaration should match the autogenerated one in libbfd.h.  */
 
+extern bfd_boolean bfd_cache_close_all (void);
+
 extern bfd_boolean bfd_record_phdr
   (bfd *, unsigned long, bfd_boolean, flagword, bfd_boolean, bfd_vma,
    bfd_boolean, bfd_boolean, unsigned int, struct bfd_section **);
Index: bfd-in2.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/bfd-in2.h,v
retrieving revision 1.280
diff -u -r1.280 bfd-in2.h
--- bfd-in2.h	15 Jun 2004 01:24:22 -0000	1.280
+++ bfd-in2.h	17 Jun 2004 10:34:24 -0000
@@ -518,6 +518,8 @@
   (bfd *abfd);
 /* NB: This declaration should match the autogenerated one in libbfd.h.  */
 
+extern bfd_boolean bfd_cache_close_all (void);
+
 extern bfd_boolean bfd_record_phdr
   (bfd *, unsigned long, bfd_boolean, flagword, bfd_boolean, bfd_vma,
    bfd_boolean, bfd_boolean, unsigned int, struct bfd_section **);
Index: cache.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/cache.c,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.14 cache.c
--- cache.c	5 May 2004 15:39:11 -0000	1.14
+++ cache.c	17 Jun 2004 10:34:25 -0000
@@ -344,6 +344,31 @@
 }
 
 /*
+FUNCTION
+	bfd_cache_close_all
+
+SYNOPSIS
+	bfd_boolean bfd_cache_close_all (void);
+
+DESCRIPTION
+	Remove all BFDs from the cache. If the attached file is open,
+	then close it too.
+
+RETURNS
+	<<FALSE>> is returned if closing one of the file fails, <<TRUE>> is
+	returned if all is well.
+*/
+
+bfd_boolean
+bfd_cache_close_all ()
+{
+  bfd_boolean ret = TRUE;
+
+  while (bfd_last_cache != NULL)
+    ret &= bfd_cache_close (bfd_last_cache);
+}
+
+/*
 INTERNAL_FUNCTION
 	bfd_open_file
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] bfd_cache_close_all
  2004-06-17 11:51   ` Jerome Guitton
@ 2004-06-17 11:58     ` Jerome Guitton
  2004-06-17 12:09       ` Alan Modra
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Guitton @ 2004-06-17 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils, gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 245 bytes --]

Oh wait, there is no return statement... I've checked in the following,
as obvious. Do I need to add a changelog entry?

2004-06-17  Jerome Guitton  <guitton@gnat.com>

	* cache.c (bfd_cache_close_all): Add missing return statement.

-- 
Jerome

[-- Attachment #2: ob.dif --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 405 bytes --]

Index: cache.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/cache.c,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -p -r1.15 cache.c
--- cache.c	17 Jun 2004 11:47:18 -0000	1.15
+++ cache.c	17 Jun 2004 11:53:58 -0000
@@ -366,6 +366,8 @@ bfd_cache_close_all ()
 
   while (bfd_last_cache != NULL)
     ret &= bfd_cache_close (bfd_last_cache);
+
+  return ret;
 }
 
 /*

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] bfd_cache_close_all
  2004-06-17 11:58     ` Jerome Guitton
@ 2004-06-17 12:09       ` Alan Modra
  2004-06-17 12:11         ` Jerome Guitton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan Modra @ 2004-06-17 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jerome Guitton; +Cc: binutils, gdb-patches

On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 02:57:58PM +0200, Jerome Guitton wrote:
> Oh wait, there is no return statement... I've checked in the following,
> as obvious. Do I need to add a changelog entry?

I don't think it matters.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] bfd_cache_close_all
  2004-06-17 12:09       ` Alan Modra
@ 2004-06-17 12:11         ` Jerome Guitton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Guitton @ 2004-06-17 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils, gdb-patches

Alan Modra (amodra@bigpond.net.au):

> I don't think it matters.

OK, thanks again.

-- 
Jerome

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-17 12:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-16 16:17 [RFA] bfd_cache_close_all Jerome Guitton
2004-06-17  2:22 ` Alan Modra
2004-06-17 11:51   ` Jerome Guitton
2004-06-17 11:58     ` Jerome Guitton
2004-06-17 12:09       ` Alan Modra
2004-06-17 12:11         ` Jerome Guitton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).