Results for 2.15.92 20040924 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

Results for 2.15.92 20040924 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

[Christian Joensson]

AuroraFedora Core release 1.91 (Wombat FC2) UP UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:

binutils-2.15.90.0.3-6
bison-1.875-7.1
dejagnu-1.4.2-11
expect-5.39.0-96.1
gcc-3.3.3-3
glibc-2.3.3-26sparc3.sparc
glibc-2.3.3-26sparc3.sparc64
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-14sparc
kernel-2.6.8-1.571sp1
tcl-8.4.5-6
zlib-1.2.1.1-2.1.sparc
zlib-1.2.1.1-2.1.sparc64

LAST_UPDATED: Fri Sep 24 12:12:30 UTC 2004 (except ylwrap)

Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu

		=== binutils tests ===


Running target unix

		=== binutils Summary ===

# of expected passes		33
		=== gas tests ===


Running target unix

		=== gas Summary ===

# of expected passes		68
		=== ld tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
FAIL: TLS -fno-pic -shared

		=== ld Summary ===

# of expected passes		205
# of unexpected failures	2
# of expected failures		3

version: binutils 2.15.92 20040924
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
Counting all warnings,
there are 24 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
     10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
      6 libiberty/regex.c
      4 include/fibheap.h
      2 include/xregex2.h
      1 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/bfd/hash.c
      1 lex.yy.c

Number of warning types:
     10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
      6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
      4 bit-field \`???' type invalid in ISO C
      2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
      1 \`???' defined but not used
      1 comparison between signed and unsigned