Results for 2.15.93 20041011 testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Results for 2.15.93 20041011 testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Christian Joensson]

Fedora Core release Rawhide (Rawhide) ia32 pentium III dual i686:

binutils-2.15.92.0.2-2
bison-1.875c-2
dejagnu-1.4.4-2
expect-5.42.1-1
gcc-3.4.2-5
glibc-2.3.3-66
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.87
kernel-2.6.8-1.603
kernel-smp-2.6.8-1.603
tcl-8.4.7-1

LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 08:07:26 UTC 2004

Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu

		=== binutils tests ===


Running target unix

		=== binutils Summary ===

# of expected passes		33
		=== gas tests ===


Running target unix

		=== gas Summary ===

# of expected passes		79
		=== ld tests ===


Running target unix

		=== ld Summary ===

# of expected passes		225
# of expected failures		4

version: 2.15.93 20041011
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
Counting all warnings,
there are 29 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
     10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
     10 libiberty/concat.c
      6 libiberty/regex.c
      2 include/xregex2.h
      1 lex.yy.c

Number of warning types:
     10 traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions
     10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
      6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
      2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
      1 'yyunput' defined but not used

Re: Results for 2.15.93 20041011 testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Aaron W. LaFramboise]

Christian Joensson wrote:

> LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 11 08:07:26 UTC 2004

What are you using to format these test results?  This looks like the
output of the GCC gcc_update and test_summary scripts, but the comments
indicate that these don't work for anything besides GCC.

Aaron W. LaFramboise