Results for 2.15.94 20041126 testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin

Results for 2.15.94 20041126 testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin

[Christian Joensson]

Windows XP Pro/SP2 cygwin P4 mobile system with these packages:

binutils             20040725-2	    2.15.91 20040725
bison                20030307-1	    1.875b
cygwin               1.5.12-1	    
dejagnu              20021217-2	    1.4.2.x
expect               20030128-1	    5.26
gcc                  3.3.3-3	    
tcltk                20030901-1	    8.4

LAST_UPDATED: Fri Nov 26 14:04:46 UTC 2004

Native configuration is i686-pc-cygwin

		=== binutils tests ===


Running target unix

		=== binutils Summary ===

# of expected passes		71
# of expected failures		1
		=== gas tests ===


Running target unix

		=== gas Summary ===

# of expected passes		62
		=== ld tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: cdtest with -Ur
FAIL: weak symbols

		=== ld Summary ===

# of expected passes		36
# of unexpected failures	2
# of expected failures		3

version: 2.15.94 20041126
Platform: i686-pc-cygwin
configure flags: --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib
Counting all warnings,
there are 19 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
      3	libiberty/regex.c
      3	lex.yy.c
      3	include/getopt.h
      2	libiberty/getopt.c
      2	include/fibheap.h
      2	/usr/local/src/trunk/src/bfd/elf.c
      1	libtool
      1	libiberty/strsignal.c
      1	include/xregex2.h
      1	/usr/local/src/trunk/src/intl/l10nflist.c

Number of warning types:
      3	signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
      3	function declaration isn't a prototype
      3	\`???' defined but not used
      2	unused parameter \`???'
      2	bit-field \`???' type invalid in ISO C
      2	??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)
      1	comparison between signed and unsigned
      1	assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
      1	\`???' seems to be moved
      1	ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators