From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-36927-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 10458 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2004 21:05:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 10330 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2004 21:05:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2004 21:05:36 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBLL5als031420
	for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:05:36 -0500
Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBLL5Zr14647;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:05:35 -0500
Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222])
	by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iBLL5Z826184;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:05:35 -0500
Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBLL5XU1017553;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:05:33 -0500
Received: (from dj@localhost)
	by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iBLL5VvC017549;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:05:31 -0500
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:05:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200412212105.iBLL5VvC017549@greed.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: ian@airs.com
CC: bje@au.ibm.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <m3zn088jpi.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> (message from Ian Lance Taylor
	on 20 Dec 2004 21:32:25 -0500)
Subject: Re: Use $(SHELL) when running move-if-change
References: <20041220212226.32268.qmail@gossamer.airs.com>
	<87zn08edhb.fsf@au.ibm.com> <m3zn088jpi.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2


> Personally I would just as soon keep the top level files in synch
> with gcc as much as possible.  So, how about if it is accepted for
> gcc, it's OK for binutils?

GCC is in regressions-only mode, so I suspect cosmetic changes like
this would be discouraged until after they branch.