From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10963 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2005 19:35:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10728 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2005 19:35:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2005 19:35:18 -0000 Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.212.230]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20050113193517013009b9p0e>; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:35:17 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07B34640F4; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:35:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:35:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: "Allan B. Cruse" , binutils@sources.redhat.com Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, GNU C Library , linux kernel Subject: Change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 Message-ID: <20050113193516.GA441@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 I am proposing to change i386 assembler/disassembler for SIB with INDEX==4 http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=658 It will change the assembler output for (%ebx,[1248]). I am not too worried about the disassembler output since assembler can't generate SIB with INDEX==4 directly today. Any comments? H.J.