From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-37452-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 510 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2005 14:12:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 32385 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2005 14:12:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2005 14:12:29 -0000
Received: from dyn-83-156-215-158.ppp.tiscali.fr (83.156.215.158) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.1.026)
        id 41A46BF60129786D; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:12:26 +0100
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
To: Christian Joensson <christian.joensson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Q: Estimated date for 2.16 release ?
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:12:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com,
 Tomer Levi <Tomer.Levi@nsc.com>,
 nickc@redhat.com,
 Paul Woegerer <Paul.Woegerer@nsc.com>
References: <OF61577335.B313AA4D-ONC2256F96.004AE546-C2256F96.004B5A37@nsc.com> <20050127140010.GA447@nevyn.them.org> <5460e33305012706072167077c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5460e33305012706072167077c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501271513.27111.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2

> may I humbly ask for help with
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171

IMHO mixing TLS, -fno-pic and -shared is really asking for troubles. :-)

I plan on revisiting SPARC TLS support (especially 64-bit) in the near future, 
but after 2.16 has branched.

-- 
Eric Botcazou