From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-37584-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14053 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2005 23:09:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14010 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2005 23:09:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ausmtp02.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.187)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2005 23:09:37 -0000
Received: from sd0112e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh903.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.201])
	by ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0VN6qot097936
	for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:06:52 +1100
Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.242])
	by sd0112e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j0VNBkqj200294
	for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:11:46 +1100
Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0VN9Y2f015508
	for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:09:34 +1100
Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.190.164.82])
	by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0VN9XvT015503;
	Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:09:34 +1100
Received: from namadgi.ozlabs.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 95DFC17DDC; Tue,  1 Feb 2005 10:09:32 +1100 (EST)
Received: by namadgi.ozlabs.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue,  1 Feb 2005 10:11:15 +1100
From: "Ben Elliston" <bje@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:09:00 -0000
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: bfd cleanups
Message-ID: <20050131231115.GC4457@namadgi>
References: <20050131052731.GA16841@namadgi> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0501311519450.36412@dair.pair.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="raC6veAxrt5nqIoY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0501311519450.36412@dair.pair.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00579.txt.bz2


--raC6veAxrt5nqIoY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 330

> Please keep the comment in cpu-cris.c.  I think the code also serves
> a purpose, so please keep as a whole or suggest some improvement in
> documentness "so that it doesn't just look like disabled code".
> Maybe add "This code is disabled but kept as a warning" to the top
> of the comment?

Changed as suggested.

Cheers, Ben

--raC6veAxrt5nqIoY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-length: 189

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB/rsTMGpskFPkywkRAmT3AJ9cuzH5LWAwM7f1VEf5MANY3rJyOACeMIXT
Pxs3Hsn4yXPjaKfpfsl8M7g=
=Ygxb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--raC6veAxrt5nqIoY--