From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5639 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2005 03:31:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5632 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 03:31:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc12.comcast.net) (204.127.202.56) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 03:31:24 -0000 Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.212.230]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005021503312401200fdti2e>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 03:31:24 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BAB8165603; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:31:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:35:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: James E Wilson Cc: Jan Beulich , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: open ia64 issues Message-ID: <20050215033123.GA19555@lucon.org> References: <1108430748.7874.105.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1108430748.7874.105.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00328.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:25:48PM -0800, James E Wilson wrote: > probably wait until after the branch is made. That would give us > roughly a year to work out problems before it appears in an official > release. It would also avoid unnecessary delays with the binutils-2.16 > release. There might be an issue if HJ tries to create a release from a > snapshot of mainline, but that would be HJ's problem. > I can deal with that. I am preparing a new Linux binutils branched from 2.15.94.0.2 now since the mainline isn't very stable for me. H.J.