From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-38052-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14978 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2005 02:02:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14596 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2005 02:01:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO modra.org) (144.136.221.26)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2005 02:01:51 -0000
Received: by bubble.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id A02F4189C76; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:31:49 +1030 (CST)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:15:00 -0000
From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: binutils@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Patch to add objdump to TOOL_PROGS
Message-ID: <20050218020149.GK10128@bubble.modra.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	binutils@gcc.gnu.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502172049260.29995@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502172049260.29995@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 08:50:25PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> This patch adds objdump to TOOL_PROGS so a link to it gets installed
> in tooldir.

Please apply.

> The GCC testsuite
> expects to find objdump (not target-objdump) in the PATH, if not
> building binutils in a unified tree

Sound like a bug that needs fixing too.  Why doesn't gcc first try for
target-objdump?

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre