From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5245 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2005 16:48:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5214 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2005 16:48:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2005 16:48:30 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3GjR-0005Us-Hp; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:48:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Kristis Makris Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: libelf from binutils ? Message-ID: <20050221164824.GA21090@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kristis Makris , binutils@sourceware.org References: <1109004263.27517.18.camel@syd.mkgnu.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1109004263.27517.18.camel@syd.mkgnu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:44:23AM -0700, Kristis Makris wrote: > Hello, > > I'm interested in reusing parts of the sources of some binutils > (particularly objdump). Given that libbfd is available directly from the > binutils source, it's interesting that a corresponding libelf is > missing. Are there any plans for packaging such a library, or should one > go the route of doing vendor imports of the elf includes etc from > binutils and tracking updates to those ? > > There seems to be a separate libelf out there > (http://packages.debian.org/testing/libdevel/libelfg0-dev) that is not > coming from binutils sources. There is no "libelf" in binutils. All the ELF handling is inside libbfd. You can import the include/elf/ headers separately if you need them. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC