From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9432 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2005 23:06:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9410 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2005 23:06:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gizmo10bw.bigpond.com) (144.140.70.20) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2005 23:06:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 17201 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2005 23:06:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bwmam12.bigpond.com) (144.135.24.103) by gizmo10bw.bigpond.com with SMTP; 21 Feb 2005 23:06:21 -0000 Received: from cpe-144-136-221-26.sa.bigpond.net.au ([144.136.221.26]) by bwmam12.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 189/10480338) with SMTP id 10480338; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:06:21 +1000 Received: by bubble.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 676ED17F986; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:36:21 +1030 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:05:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: More MIPS testsuite fixes Message-ID: <20050221230621.GB900@bubble.modra.org> Mail-Followup-To: binutils@sources.redhat.com References: <20050221155056.GA19151@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050221155056.GA19151@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:50:57AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Alan, I gather you have > a list of targets that you run through the testsuite for; could you add > mips-linux? I already have it on my list (and had seen the failures, just not fixed them). Hmm, since we are talking mips failures, I also test mips-ecoff: $ grep FAIL check.log0 | wc -l 318 How about someone in the mips camp fixing them, or deprecate the target? > Is the patch OK? Yes, looks good. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre