From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14272 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2005 19:41:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14198 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2005 19:40:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.202.59) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2005 19:40:56 -0000 Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.212.230]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2005022319405501400s544me>; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:40:55 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 36DA165604; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:40:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:39:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Andrew Cagney Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Rearrange SEC_XXX bits Message-ID: <20050223194053.GA31025@lucon.org> References: <20050221211925.GB14151@lucon.org> <421C983D.8050201@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <421C983D.8050201@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:50:37AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > H. J. Lu wrote: > >We have very limited space in BFD section flag. But SEC_ARCH_BIT_0 is > >never used. There are also some COFF and TI specific bits. This patch > >removes SEC_ARCH_BIT_0 and makes COFF/TI specific bits for COFF/TI > >only so that other format/target can reuse those bits. > > FYI, this looks to break gdb's dump.exp testcase (that test writes out > then reads back random object file formats verifying the result). Right > now I consider this 'weird'. > I don't see how my patch should change anything. In any case, I got Running /export/gnu/src/gdb/gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/detach.exp ... Running /export/gnu/src/gdb/gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/display.exp ... Running /export/gnu/src/gdb/gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dump.exp ... Running /export/gnu/src/gdb/gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/echo.exp ... It looks fine to me. H.J.