From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-38233-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7920 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2005 17:46:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7794 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 17:46:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 17:46:50 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian))
	id 1D4N4J-0001cp-Sj; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:46:32 -0500
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:53:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
Cc: "Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com>" <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com, Eric Norum <norume@aps.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: Q: Estimated date for 2.16 release ?
Message-ID: <20050224174631.GE5216@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>,
	"Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com>" <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com, Eric Norum <norume@aps.anl.gov>
References: <OF61577335.B313AA4D-ONC2256F96.004AE546-C2256F96.004B5A37@nsc.com> <20050127140010.GA447@nevyn.them.org> <41F8F9D3.3080502@OARcorp.com> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0501270929540.56553@dair.pair.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0501270929540.56553@dair.pair.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00605.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 09:36:11AM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com> wrote:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00489.html
> >
> > Eric Norum (cc'ed) recently narrowed it down to this construct:
> >
> > =============================================================
> > A little poking around reveals that it's the lines like:
> >
> > _RamBase = DEFINED(_RamBase) ? _RamBase : 0x0;
> > _RamSize = DEFINED(_RamSize) ? _RamSize : 0x7f0000;
> > _HeapSize = DEFINED(_HeapSize) ? _HeapSize : 0;   /* 0x20000;*/
> > _StackSize = DEFINED(_StackSize) ? _StackSize : 1M; /* 0x2000;*/
> >
> > that are killing ld.
> > ==============================================================
> >
> > Does this sound familiar?
> 
> Yes. :-(  The semantics of DEFINED has changed.  IIRC, my patch
> to announce that in ld/NEWS before 2.15 received no comments.
> The usage above should still work, though.
> 
> Can you open a PR with binutils-self-contained (only assembly
> files, no C or objects) test-case?  Maybe all was at the URL
> above, but I don't see the ld command line.  Still, please open
> a PR.

Was a PR ever created for this?  Has anyone looked at it?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC