From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1278 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2005 22:01:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1265 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2005 22:01:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (134.68.220.30) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2005 22:01:06 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDUxO-0000Hd-6O for binutils@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:01:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 3133 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2005 16:57:07 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 21 Mar 2005 16:57:07 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: uclibc patches Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200503201949.59388.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050321214923.GA18005@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20050321214923.GA18005@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503211701.37726.vapier@gentoo.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00640.txt.bz2 On Monday 21 March 2005 04:49 pm, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 07:49:59PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >On Sunday 20 March 2005 07:19 am, Nick Clifton wrote: > >> > Would patches to add support for tuple > >> > arch-*-linux-uclibc* > >> > be acceptable? > >> > >> Yes - provided that the copyright holder for the patches has a binutils > >> FSF copyright assignment in place, or if the patches are small enough > >> and simple enough to qualify as obvious. > > > >basically every place you see '-linux-gnu*', add a similar > > '-linux-uclibc*' match > > Perhaps it is politically incorrect to suggest this, but wouldn't it > make sense to just allow -linux-* rather than add a bunch of > linux-uclibc's everywhere? it doesnt matter to me which is used so long as 'it works' :) although i dont use dietlibc, i think this kind of change would also benefit them (iirc, they use -linux-dietlibc in their tuples) ... anyone know if klibc does something like this too ? -mike