From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21280 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2005 17:22:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21219 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2005 17:22:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2005 17:22:33 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DEsW8-0004yF-Gp; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:22:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Steve Underwood Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, Dmitry Subject: Re: Supposedly unsupported targets Message-ID: <20050325172240.GA19063@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Underwood , binutils@sources.redhat.com, Dmitry References: <42443F09.3080202@coppice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42443F09.3080202@coppice.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00784.txt.bz2 On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 12:40:41AM +0800, Steve Underwood wrote: > Hi, > > On 22nd March a message was posted proposing support for a number of > targets in binutils be deprecated. The MSP430 was included as an > unmaintained target. I am puzzled by this. It is very actively > maintained. Updates for this MSP430 went into binutils not too long ago. > I have another bunch of updates we are getting ready to submit for new > parts in the MSP430 family. > > Can someone tell me what criteria have been used to draw up the list? > Has the MSP430 been included by mistake? Alan wrote: Some of the targets I put in the dead/maintainerless list are fairly new. I put them on the list simply because the original contributor didn't put their name in binutils/MAINTAINERS. Please fix.. Please see: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-03/msg00704.html Dmitry, do you have commit access? If so, could you commit the patch? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC