From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15497 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2005 13:23:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14609 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2005 13:23:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2005 13:23:22 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DIRXt-0008In-KS; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:23:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:23:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Clifton Cc: Jan Beulich , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: push creates wrong relocation Message-ID: <20050404132312.GB30017@nevyn.them.org> References: <42511298.1040105@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42511298.1040105@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Jan, > > >Now, should any of them (clearly not the .macro one) also go into 2.16? > >Thanks, Jan > > This is up to Daniel, > > I think that these two would be reasonable: > > 2005-04-01 Jan Beulich > > * i386-dis.c (PNI_Fixup): Neither mwait nor monitor have any > visible operands in Intel mode. The first operand of monitor is > %rax in 64-bit mode. > > 2005-04-01 Jan Beulich > > * i386-dis.c (INVLPG_Fixup): Decode rdtscp; change code to allow for > easier future additions. That's fine with me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC