From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-39516-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21320 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2005 20:27:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21275 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2005 20:27:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2005 20:27:05 -0000
Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.212.230]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <20050410202705013001e0c3e>; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:27:05 +0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E5A6563D5D; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 20:27:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, bob.wilson@acm.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Support 64bit BFD and 64bit host for xtensa
Message-ID: <20050410202704.GA32166@lucon.org>
References: <20050409204835.GA1319@lucon.org> <20050410163925.GB28734@lucon.org> <je7jjawfr0.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <je7jjawfr0.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2

On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:14:59PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> 
> > --- gas/config/tc-i960.c.64bit	2005-03-25 10:18:49.000000000 -0800
> > +++ gas/config/tc-i960.c	2005-04-10 09:21:12.216332749 -0700
> > @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ get_cdisp (char *dispP, /* Displacement 
> >  	    {
> >  	      outP = frag_more (8);	/* Allocate worst-case storage.  */
> >  	      md_number_to_chars (outP, instr, 4);
> > -	      frag_variant (rs_machine_dependent, 4, 4, 1,
> > +	      frag_variant (rs_machine_dependent, 4, 4L, 1,
> 
> What is this good for?
> 

Just to play it safe.


H.J.