From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16718 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2005 17:37:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16664 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2005 17:37:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2005 17:37:32 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 38A6413C2AA; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:37:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:37:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: nickc@redhat.com, u-thiel@gmx.net, Jan Beulich , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PE32+ Format! Message-ID: <20050411173732.GN30365@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: nickc@redhat.com, u-thiel@gmx.net, Jan Beulich , binutils@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 06:04:37PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >>By the way - is there any public documentation on the PE32+ format >>available ? > >I know only of the MSDN doc (which can't really be considered public I >guess), but since Cygwin appears to know about the (or at least some, >did a brief check only) 64-bit extensions they must have gotten them >from somewhere... ? What 64-bit extensions does cygwin know about? cgf