From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-39636-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15681 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2005 19:51:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15058 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2005 19:51:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2005 19:51:16 -0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (root@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j3DJp56n019369;
	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:51:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3DJp4qO028565;
	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:51:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j3DJp4YG017209;
	Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:51:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:51:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200504131951.j3DJp4YG017209@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: hjl@lucon.org
CC: binutils@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20050413192952.GA1517@lucon.org> (hjl@lucon.org)
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Proper mnemonics for VIA PadLock (i386) instructions
References: <200504121915.j3CJFO0P017574@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <425C305A.6000504@logix.cz> <200504122043.j3CKhAwO031139@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050413003755.GH3321@bubble.modra.org> <200504131855.j3DIt9WT021291@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20050413192952.GA1517@lucon.org>
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2

   Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:29:52 -0700
   From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>

   I have the same concern as Alan. Unless ALL x86 assembly codes, open
   source or otherwise, not just those on OpenBSD, have been assembled
   correctly with the modified assembler, I don't think it should go into
   the FSF assembler.

This is a ridiculous statement.

Mark