From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10614 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2005 23:35:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10332 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2005 23:35:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mallaury.noc.nerim.net) (62.4.17.104) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2005 23:35:12 -0000 Received: from tetto.gentiane.org (espie.gentiane.org [62.212.102.210]) by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8D462D1E for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:35:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tetto.home (espie@localhost.my.domain [127.0.0.1]) by tetto.gentiane.org (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3DNZ7Fh003251 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:35:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from espie@localhost) by tetto.home (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j3DNZ6eD003429 for binutils@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:35:00 -0000 From: Marc Espie To: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Proper mnemonics for VIA PadLock (i386) instructions Message-ID: <20050413233503.GA9475@tetto.home> Reply-To: espie@nerim.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00348.txt.bz2 H.J.Lu wrote: > have the same concern as Alan. Unless ALL x86 assembly codes, open > source or otherwise, not just those on OpenBSD, have been assembled > correctly with the modified assembler, I don't think it should go into > the FSF assembler. We have something like >4G of source code between source, X, and ports in OpenBSD. If that's not sufficient coverage, then I don't know what is. Guys, OpenBSD is not a niche OS. We compile a heck of a lot of stuff. H.J., I also have a problem taking your statement seriously, considering how often your patches break stuff that is not linux. Should we demand that you test your patches on ALL OSes that use i386 before committing a 386 change ?