From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21000 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2005 01:26:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20449 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2005 01:25:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gizmo09ps.bigpond.com) (144.140.71.19) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2005 01:25:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 30722 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2005 01:25:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam12.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.103) by gizmo09ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 2005 01:25:55 -0000 Received: from cpe-144-136-221-26.sa.bigpond.net.au ([144.136.221.26]) by psmam12.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 234/12082028) with SMTP id 12082028; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:25:55 +1000 Received: by bubble.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2048819E1DD; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:55:55 +0930 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:26:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Thorsten Glaser Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] Proper mnemonics for VIA PadLock (i386) instructions Message-ID: <20050414012555.GB5968@bubble.modra.org> Mail-Followup-To: Thorsten Glaser , binutils@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00355.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 03:20:25PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > DOES it fail then? :) Note that I carefully said "Something like" the example I posted. I know that we had trouble in the past with the assembler pre-processor stripping whitespace completely (see tc_symbol_chars), but it may be that this can't happen now for the mnemonic part of an assembly line. If one of the proponents of this patch analyse app.c behaviour enough to give a reasonable level of confidence, I'll accept the patch. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre