From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8695 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2005 00:36:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8682 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2005 00:36:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc12.comcast.net) (204.127.202.56) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2005 00:36:47 -0000 Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.212.230]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <200504160036470120053o9oe>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:36:47 +0000 Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B53F63F44; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:36:00 -0000 From: "H. J. Lu" To: Nick Clifton , wilson@specifixinc.com, Jan Beulich , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ELF: make .struct interact with .previous Message-ID: <20050416003646.GA16052@lucon.org> References: <425F9C9F.80903@redhat.com> <20050415173112.GA10069@lucon.org> <20050415183718.GA11086@lucon.org> <20050415220015.GD5334@bubble.modra.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050415220015.GD5334@bubble.modra.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00445.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 07:30:16AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:37:18AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > I don't think we should call md_cons_align for ABS section. This patch > > fixes the failure. > > Why not? If you need to do something special for the absolute section, > then md_cons_align itself should handle that. What special alignment can a backend can do for the absolute section? H.J.