From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9616 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2005 04:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9597 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2005 04:19:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2005 04:19:34 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DOT9g-0002no-4I; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:19:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 04:19:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ralf Corsepius Cc: Alan Modra , Nick Clifton , Binutils List , Joel Sherrill Subject: Re: binutils-2.16 news Message-ID: <20050421041907.GA10726@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ralf Corsepius , Alan Modra , Nick Clifton , Binutils List , Joel Sherrill References: <20050420071453.GC3052@bubble.modra.org> <1113986765.18714.87.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <42662352.9040107@redhat.com> <1113992171.18714.130.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <20050421032051.GB5450@bubble.modra.org> <1114055366.18714.158.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1114055366.18714.158.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00595.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 05:49:26AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 12:50 +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:16:11PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 10:39 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > > > > >>+ h8300-*-coff > > > > >>+ h8300-*-rtems* > > > > > > > > > > Does this mean you are going to remove the entire h8 series or why are > > > > > you planning to remove these 2 targets? > > > > > > > > No, the h8300-elf port is still going to be valid. It is just that at > > > > the moment it looks like nobody wants to step up and champion the > > > > h8300-coff and h8300-rtems ports... > > > OK, I understand, the reason is coff? > > > > No, the reason is a non-BFD_ASSEMBLER gas port. I want to rip out all > > the old non-BFD_ASSEMBLER gas code, so unless the tc files are converted > > over to BFD_ASSEMBLER they will no longer compile. > Now, you've lost me. > > AFAIU, this would affect h8300-*-elf, too, i.e. you'd be removing the > h8300 port as a whole. case ${fmt} in elf | ecoff | multi | som) bfd_gas=yes ;; esac No, all ELF targets are BFD_ASSEMBLER. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC