public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFA] obsoleting BFD_NEED_DECLARATION
@ 2005-04-21 12:16 Jerome Guitton
  2005-04-22  9:54 ` Nick Clifton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Guitton @ 2005-04-21 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]


Replacing BFD_NEEDED_DECLARATION by AC_CHECK_DECL, as proposed here:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2005-04/msg00554.html

OK to apply?

-- 
Jerome

[-- Attachment #2: ac_check_decl.dif --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3011 bytes --]

2005-04-21  Jerome Guitton  <guitton@gnat.com>

	* configure.in: Replace BFD_NEED_DECLARATION checks by the
	corresponding AC_CHECK_DECLS.
	* sysdep.h: Replace NEED_DECLARATION_* checks by the corresponding
	HAVE_DECL_*.
	* bfd.m4 (BFD_NEED_DECLARATION): Remove, obsolete.
	* configure: Regenerate.
	* config.in: Ditto.

Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.177
diff -u -r1.177 configure.in
--- configure.in	20 Apr 2005 15:00:12 -0000	1.177
+++ configure.in	21 Apr 2005 12:08:07 -0000
@@ -135,12 +135,12 @@
 
 BFD_BINARY_FOPEN
 
-BFD_NEED_DECLARATION(ffs)
-BFD_NEED_DECLARATION(free)
-BFD_NEED_DECLARATION(getenv)
-BFD_NEED_DECLARATION(malloc)
-BFD_NEED_DECLARATION(realloc)
-BFD_NEED_DECLARATION(strstr)
+AC_CHECK_DECLS(ffs)
+AC_CHECK_DECLS(free)
+AC_CHECK_DECLS(getenv)
+AC_CHECK_DECLS(malloc)
+AC_CHECK_DECLS(realloc)
+AC_CHECK_DECLS(strstr)
 
 # If we are configured native, pick a core file support file.
 COREFILE=
Index: sysdep.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/sysdep.h,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 sysdep.h
--- sysdep.h	20 Apr 2005 15:00:15 -0000	1.9
+++ sysdep.h	21 Apr 2005 12:08:07 -0000
@@ -105,27 +105,27 @@
 
 #include "filenames.h"
 
-#ifdef NEED_DECLARATION_FFS
+#if !HAVE_DECL_FFS
 extern int ffs (int);
 #endif
 
-#ifdef NEED_DECLARATION_FREE
+#if !HAVE_DECL_FREE
 extern void free ();
 #endif
 
-#ifdef NEED_DECLARATION_GETENV
+#if !HAVE_DECL_GETENV
 extern char *getenv ();
 #endif
 
-#ifdef NEED_DECLARATION_MALLOC
+#if !HAVE_DECL_MALLOC
 extern PTR malloc ();
 #endif
 
-#ifdef NEED_DECLARATION_REALLOC
+#if !HAVE_DECL_REALLOC
 extern PTR realloc ();
 #endif
 
-#ifdef NEED_DECLARATION_STRSTR
+#if !HAVE_DECL_STRSTR
 extern char *strstr ();
 #endif
 
Index: bfd.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/bfd.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 bfd.m4
--- bfd.m4	15 Jan 2005 19:14:54 -0000	1.1
+++ bfd.m4	21 Apr 2005 12:08:07 -0000
@@ -1,36 +1,6 @@
 dnl This file was derived from acinclude.m4.
 
 
-dnl See whether we need a declaration for a function.
-
-AC_DEFUN([BFD_NEED_DECLARATION],
-[AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether $1 must be declared])
-AC_CACHE_VAL(bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1,
-[AC_TRY_COMPILE([
-#include <stdio.h>
-#ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
-#include <string.h>
-#else
-#ifdef HAVE_STRINGS_H
-#include <strings.h>
-#endif
-#endif
-#ifdef HAVE_STDLIB_H
-#include <stdlib.h>
-#endif
-#ifdef HAVE_UNISTD_H
-#include <unistd.h>
-#endif],
-[char *(*pfn) = (char *(*)) $1],
-bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1=no, bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1=yes)])
-AC_MSG_RESULT($bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1)
-if test $bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1 = yes; then
-  AC_DEFINE([NEED_DECLARATION_]translit($1, [a-z], [A-Z]), 1,
-	    [Define if $1 is not declared in system header files.])
-fi
-])dnl
-
-
 dnl Check for existence of a type $1 in sys/procfs.h
 
 AC_DEFUN([BFD_HAVE_SYS_PROCFS_TYPE],

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] obsoleting BFD_NEED_DECLARATION
  2005-04-21 12:16 [RFA] obsoleting BFD_NEED_DECLARATION Jerome Guitton
@ 2005-04-22  9:54 ` Nick Clifton
  2005-04-22 13:59   ` Jerome Guitton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2005-04-22  9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jerome Guitton; +Cc: binutils

Hi Jerome,

 > 2005-04-21  Jerome Guitton  <guitton@gnat.com>
 >
 >	* configure.in: Replace BFD_NEED_DECLARATION checks by the
 >	corresponding AC_CHECK_DECLS.
 >	* sysdep.h: Replace NEED_DECLARATION_* checks by the corresponding
 > 	HAVE_DECL_*.
 > 	* bfd.m4 (BFD_NEED_DECLARATION): Remove, obsolete.
 >	* configure: Regenerate.
 > 	* config.in: Ditto.

Approved - please apply.

Cheers
   Nick

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] obsoleting BFD_NEED_DECLARATION
  2005-04-22  9:54 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2005-04-22 13:59   ` Jerome Guitton
  2005-04-25  1:41     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Guitton @ 2005-04-22 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: binutils

Nick Clifton (nickc@redhat.com):

> > 2005-04-21  Jerome Guitton  <guitton@gnat.com>
> >
> >	* configure.in: Replace BFD_NEED_DECLARATION checks by the
> >	corresponding AC_CHECK_DECLS.
> >	* sysdep.h: Replace NEED_DECLARATION_* checks by the corresponding
> > 	HAVE_DECL_*.
> > 	* bfd.m4 (BFD_NEED_DECLARATION): Remove, obsolete.
> >	* configure: Regenerate.
> > 	* config.in: Ditto.
> 
> Approved - please apply.

Done. Thanks!
Jerome

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] obsoleting BFD_NEED_DECLARATION
  2005-04-22 13:59   ` Jerome Guitton
@ 2005-04-25  1:41     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2005-04-26  9:48       ` Jerome Guitton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-04-25  1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jerome Guitton; +Cc: Nick Clifton, binutils

On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 03:58:51PM +0200, Jerome Guitton wrote:
> Nick Clifton (nickc@redhat.com):
> 
> > > 2005-04-21  Jerome Guitton  <guitton@gnat.com>
> > >
> > >	* configure.in: Replace BFD_NEED_DECLARATION checks by the
> > >	corresponding AC_CHECK_DECLS.
> > >	* sysdep.h: Replace NEED_DECLARATION_* checks by the corresponding
> > > 	HAVE_DECL_*.
> > > 	* bfd.m4 (BFD_NEED_DECLARATION): Remove, obsolete.
> > >	* configure: Regenerate.
> > > 	* config.in: Ditto.
> > 
> > Approved - please apply.
> 
> Done. Thanks!
> Jerome

Jerome, could you please revert the bfd.m4 parts of this patch for now? 
binutils/, ld/, and mmalloc/ all use this.  Those directories still use
autoconf 2.13.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFA] obsoleting BFD_NEED_DECLARATION
  2005-04-25  1:41     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2005-04-26  9:48       ` Jerome Guitton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Guitton @ 2005-04-26  9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils

Daniel Jacobowitz (drow@false.org):

> Jerome, could you please revert the bfd.m4 parts of this patch for now? 
> binutils/, ld/, and mmalloc/ all use this.  Those directories still use
> autoconf 2.13.

Mmmm, indeed; sorry for that. Thanks for noticing it.
FYI, here is the patch that I checked in:


2005-04-26  Jerome Guitton  <guitton@gnat.com>

	* bfd.m4 (BFD_NEED_DECLARATION): Restore.

Index: bfd.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/bfd.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 bfd.m4
--- bfd.m4	22 Apr 2005 13:58:11 -0000	1.2
+++ bfd.m4	26 Apr 2005 09:18:42 -0000
@@ -1,6 +1,36 @@
 dnl This file was derived from acinclude.m4.
 
 
+dnl See whether we need a declaration for a function.
+
+AC_DEFUN([BFD_NEED_DECLARATION],
+[AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether $1 must be declared])
+AC_CACHE_VAL(bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1,
+[AC_TRY_COMPILE([
+#include <stdio.h>
+#ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
+#include <string.h>
+#else
+#ifdef HAVE_STRINGS_H
+#include <strings.h>
+#endif
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_STDLIB_H
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_UNISTD_H
+#include <unistd.h>
+#endif],
+[char *(*pfn) = (char *(*)) $1],
+bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1=no, bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1=yes)])
+AC_MSG_RESULT($bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1)
+if test $bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1 = yes; then
+  AC_DEFINE([NEED_DECLARATION_]translit($1, [a-z], [A-Z]), 1,
+	    [Define if $1 is not declared in system header files.])
+fi
+])dnl
+
+
 dnl Check for existence of a type $1 in sys/procfs.h
 
 AC_DEFUN([BFD_HAVE_SYS_PROCFS_TYPE],

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-26  9:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-21 12:16 [RFA] obsoleting BFD_NEED_DECLARATION Jerome Guitton
2005-04-22  9:54 ` Nick Clifton
2005-04-22 13:59   ` Jerome Guitton
2005-04-25  1:41     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-04-26  9:48       ` Jerome Guitton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).