From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-39953-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 4423 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2005 21:49:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 4400 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2005 21:49:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc12.comcast.net) (204.127.202.56)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2005 21:49:35 -0000
Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.212.230]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP
          id <20050424214934012004n7n8e>; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:49:34 +0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F3C8C63D5D; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:49:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used
Message-ID: <20050424214925.GA18266@lucon.org>
References: <c195ebf70504241112c4e39b4@mail.gmail.com> <20050424182151.GA15499@lucon.org> <d4gqkc$pud$1@sea.gmane.org> <5460e33305042412557e7e0069@mail.gmail.com> <c195ebf705042413547d664977@mail.gmail.com> <c195ebf7050424140435b84b17@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c195ebf7050424140435b84b17@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00653.txt.bz2

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:04:11PM -0400, sean darcy wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com>
> Date: Apr 24, 2005 4:54 PM
> Subject: Re: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used
> To: Christian Joensson <christian.joensson@gmail.com>
> 
> 
> >
> > H.J. made a release off of mainline a few weeks ago... maybe you could
> > try that one also?
> >
> 
> Got and installed binutils-2.16.90.0.1-1.x86_64.rpm
> 

Please first double check that your bug isn't one of

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20218
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20297

Then if you still believe it is a binutils bug, please open a bug
report at

http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/

with a testcase.


H.J.