* relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used
@ 2005-04-24 18:12 sean darcy
2005-04-24 18:30 ` H. J. Lu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: sean darcy @ 2005-04-24 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
I'm trying to build smilutils, a video conversion utility, on amd64.
g++ -shared -nostdlib
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/../../../../lib64/crti.o
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/crtbeginS.o .libs/avi.o
.libs/filehandler.o .libs/frame.o .libs/playlist.o .libs/riff.o
.libs/error.o .libs/preferences.o .libs/gnome-stubs.o -L/usr/lib64
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lquicktime
-lpng -ldl /usr/lib64/libdv.so -lxml2 -lz -lpthread
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/../../../../lib64
-L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/../../.. -L/lib/../lib64
-L/usr/lib/../lib64 -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc_s
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/crtendS.o
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.0.0/../../../../lib64/crtn.o
-mtune=athlon64 -fPIC -Wl,-soname -Wl,libkinolegacy.so.0 -o
.libs/libkinolegacy.so.0.0.0
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/filehandler.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against
`std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>
>::~basic_string()@@GLIBCXX_3.4' can not be used when making a shared
object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
But they're al built with -fPIC:
file .libs/*.o
.libs/avi.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
.libs/error.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
.libs/filehandler.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
.libs/frame.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
.libs/gnome-stubs.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
.libs/playlist.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
.libs/preferences.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
.libs/riff.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), not stripped
For example:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -Wno-deprecated
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -O3 -fPIC -ffast-math
-fomit-frame-pointer -funit-at-a-time -mtune=athlon64 -ftree-vectorize
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -I/usr/include/ffmpeg -MT filehandler.lo
-MD -MP -MF .deps/filehandler.Tpo -c filehandler.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/filehandler.o
Puzzled.
sean
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used 2005-04-24 18:12 relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used sean darcy @ 2005-04-24 18:30 ` H. J. Lu 2005-04-24 19:35 ` sean 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: H. J. Lu @ 2005-04-24 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sean darcy; +Cc: binutils On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 02:12:00PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: > I'm trying to build smilutils, a video conversion utility, on amd64. > > /usr/bin/ld: .libs/filehandler.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against > `std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >::~basic_string()@@GLIBCXX_3.4' can not be used when making a shared > object; recompile with -fPIC > /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > But they're al built with -fPIC: > Is this the same as http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=584 Can you try the latest Linux binutils? H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used 2005-04-24 18:30 ` H. J. Lu @ 2005-04-24 19:35 ` sean [not found] ` <5460e33305042412557e7e0069@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: sean @ 2005-04-24 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: binutils H. J. Lu wrote: .................. > > Can you try the latest Linux binutils? > Thaks for the quick reply. But...I got 2.15.97. Same result. sean ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <5460e33305042412557e7e0069@mail.gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <c195ebf705042413547d664977@mail.gmail.com>]
* Fwd: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used [not found] ` <c195ebf705042413547d664977@mail.gmail.com> @ 2005-04-24 21:04 ` sean darcy 2005-04-24 21:49 ` H. J. Lu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: sean darcy @ 2005-04-24 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: binutils ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com> Date: Apr 24, 2005 4:54 PM Subject: Re: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used To: Christian Joensson <christian.joensson@gmail.com> > > H.J. made a release off of mainline a few weeks ago... maybe you could > try that one also? > Got and installed binutils-2.16.90.0.1-1.x86_64.rpm No joy. sean ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used 2005-04-24 21:04 ` Fwd: " sean darcy @ 2005-04-24 21:49 ` H. J. Lu 2005-04-25 0:55 ` sean 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: H. J. Lu @ 2005-04-24 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sean darcy; +Cc: binutils On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:04:11PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com> > Date: Apr 24, 2005 4:54 PM > Subject: Re: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used > To: Christian Joensson <christian.joensson@gmail.com> > > > > > > H.J. made a release off of mainline a few weeks ago... maybe you could > > try that one also? > > > > Got and installed binutils-2.16.90.0.1-1.x86_64.rpm > Please first double check that your bug isn't one of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20218 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20297 Then if you still believe it is a binutils bug, please open a bug report at http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ with a testcase. H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used 2005-04-24 21:49 ` H. J. Lu @ 2005-04-25 0:55 ` sean 2005-04-25 0:57 ` sean darcy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: sean @ 2005-04-25 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: binutils H. J. Lu wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:04:11PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664 > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20218 > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20297 > > Then if you still believe it is a binutils bug, please open a bug > report at > > http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ > > with a testcase. > This may be bug 19664. If I don't use -fvisibility-inlines-hidden it works. Odd, I thought visibility-inlines-hidden should affect the linker. But what do I know. sean ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used 2005-04-25 0:55 ` sean @ 2005-04-25 0:57 ` sean darcy 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: sean darcy @ 2005-04-25 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: binutils On 4/24/05, sean <seandarcy2@gmail.com> wrote: > H. J. Lu wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 05:04:11PM -0400, sean darcy wrote: > > > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664 > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20218 > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20297 > > > > Then if you still believe it is a binutils bug, please open a bug > > report at > > > > http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ > > > > with a testcase. > > > This may be bug 19664. If I don't use > -fvisibility-inlines-hidden it works. > > Odd, I thought visibility-inlines-hidden should affect the > linker. > Typing without brain in gear, I mean't should *not*. > But what do I know. > > sean > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-25 0:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-04-24 18:12 relocation R_X86_64_PC32: but fPIC used sean darcy 2005-04-24 18:30 ` H. J. Lu 2005-04-24 19:35 ` sean [not found] ` <5460e33305042412557e7e0069@mail.gmail.com> [not found] ` <c195ebf705042413547d664977@mail.gmail.com> 2005-04-24 21:04 ` Fwd: " sean darcy 2005-04-24 21:49 ` H. J. Lu 2005-04-25 0:55 ` sean 2005-04-25 0:57 ` sean darcy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).