From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24411 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2005 01:45:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24377 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 01:45:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 01:45:28 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DPseb-0004xo-RI; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:44:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 01:45:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Simon Richter Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: BFD_NEED_DECLARATION Message-ID: <20050425014453.GC18863@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Simon Richter , binutils@sourceware.org References: <42698CFF.4050507@hogyros.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42698CFF.4050507@hogyros.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00658.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:47:11AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > after the cvs update I did today (last update was on Thursday, I think), > the binutils subdir no longer compiles, as the BFD_NEED_DECLARATION > macros are not expanded. I could not find a definition for them > anywhere. Where are these macros defined? I've asked Jerome to revert that patch. In the mean time you should be able to touch bfd/configure and ld/configure to prevent them from being regenerated. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC