From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-40070-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31214 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2005 10:40:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20190 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2005 10:27:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.act-europe.fr) (212.157.227.154)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2005 10:27:52 -0000
Received: from localhost (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214])
	by filtered-dublin.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6FB70229ECB; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:27:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from dublin.act-europe.fr ([10.10.0.154])
 by localhost (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 92758-04; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:27:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from berne.act-europe.fr (berne.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.165])
	by dublin.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 183CC229EBB; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:27:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by berne.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 560)
	id 6362A592B; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:27:46 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:40:00 -0000
From: Jerome Guitton <guitton@adacore.com>
To: Adam Nemet <anemet@lnxw.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] fix compilation warning in libiberty.h
Message-ID: <20050426102746.GA29592@adacore.com>
References: <20050331132734.GA25521@adacore.com> <20050331144312.GA2694@nevyn.them.org> <17001.33583.831885.170218@anemet1.lynx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <17001.33583.831885.170218@anemet1.lynx.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00770.txt.bz2

Adam Nemet (anemet@lnxw.com):

> The checked in version was:
> 
>   AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename, , , [#include "sysdep.h"]) 
> 
> How is this supposed to find sysdep.h?

It makes me think that I did the same mistake in opcodes. I checked in
the following patch, as obvious. Hopefully everything I broke recently
is now fixed. Thanks for your patience, all of you.

2005-04-26  Jerome Guitton  <guitton@gnat.com>

	* configure.in: Fix the check for basename declaration.
	* configure: Regenerate.

Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/opcodes/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -r1.55 configure.in
--- configure.in	14 Apr 2005 09:48:22 -0000	1.55
+++ configure.in	26 Apr 2005 10:14:18 -0000
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
 
 AC_CHECK_HEADERS(string.h strings.h stdlib.h)
 
-AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename, , , [#include "sysdep.h"])
+AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename)
 
 cgen_maint=no
 cgendir='$(srcdir)/../cgen'